ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	68% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Z620 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 158A
Memory	5.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150116
Uptime	15.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 03 '23 at 15:27
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Memory 84.6 1-Core 90.4 2-Core 168 68% 114 Pts	4-Core 306 8-Core 438 47% 372 Pts	64-Core 452 28% 452 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000 11,114 User benchmarks, average bench 13% HP(103C 079C) 3GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 473.47 Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Lighting 13.8 Reflection 17.7 Parallax 18.8 11% 16.8 fps	MRender 21.2 Gravity 18.5 Splatting 15.4 15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256 256GB 158 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1H3Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 153 156 156 152 139 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	68% Good	Read 445 Write 402 Mixed 344 SusWrite 175 76% 342 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 31.4 4K Mixed 28.4 91% 28.3 MB/s	DQ Read 286 DQ Write 206 DQ Mixed 236 179% 243 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 116%
Seagate Cheetah 15K.7 SAS 300GB-$79 1,032 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 251GB free Firmware: HPS3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 188 187 189 191 191 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 185 Write 188 Mixed 90.3 SusWrite 189 119% 163 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 1.6 297% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 111%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 295GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 67 60 65 60 65 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	32.5% Below average	Read 49.5 Write 64.8 Mixed 84.1 SusWrite 63.2 49% 65.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.4 114% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 71%
Usb3.0 Super Speed 160GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 146GB free Firmware: 0214 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 85 88 87 88 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	51.5% Above average	Read 92.7 Write 85.1 Mixed 55.6 SusWrite 86.7 59% 80 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YK0 2x8GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 18 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 11.3 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 72.5 55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,434 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	152x
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	152x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	131x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	174x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	113x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	96x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	72x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	68x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	61x

RAM
9965525-138.A00LF 12x8GBKingstonBench 111%, 25 samples	24x
18JDF1G72PZ-1G6E1 8x8GBMicronBench 98%, 24 samples	21x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback