Gigabyte GA-Z170N-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics74.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive74.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170N-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory18.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170306
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateMar 03 '23 at 20:51
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$163
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 120
2-Core 207
81% 139 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 605
60% 487 Pts
64-Core 609
38% 609 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.2% Very good
Lighting 91.3
Reflection 103
Parallax 91.6
74% 95.4 fps
MRender 91.5
Gravity 85.5
Splatting 92.6
74% 89.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 540s Series 480GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LSB042C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 166 142 130 120 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 431
Write 365
Mixed 333
SusWrite 152
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 68.1
4K Mixed 34.8
115% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 239
185% 255 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 95%
SHGS31-1000GS-2 1TB
169GB free
Firmware: 90000Q00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 426 380 390 418 431 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 431
Write 410
Mixed 389
SusWrite 411
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 70.8
4K Mixed 36.1
124% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 353
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 115%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 3TB
1GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 38.5
Write 39.5
Mixed 34.3
28% 37.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 108%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 6.5TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.6 2.3 2.9 2.8 2.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 65.8
Write 17.2
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 2
19% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.7
157% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 82%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 2TB
707GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 55.9
Write 30.6
Mixed 31.6
SusWrite 12
24% 32.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 109%
WD Elements 25A3 12TB
710GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 11 11 11 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
21.5% Poor
Read 39.3
Write 39.9
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 10.5
40% 30.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 1.1
188% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 100%
WD Elements 25A3 12TB
6.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 38.7
Write 39.6
Mixed 35
SusWrite 10.8
41% 31 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 1.4
216% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2800 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.3% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 22.6
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 23.1
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170N-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 512 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170N-Gaming 5 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $677
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback