Alienware m17 R2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAlienware m17 R2  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware Alienware m17 R2
Memory7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221219
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 05 '23 at 15:14
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 74.5
1-Core 119
2-Core 232
78% 142 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 616
64% 516 Pts
64-Core 687
42% 687 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Dell(1028 093C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9664
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 94.3
Parallax 8.1
5% 36.1 fps
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 12.9
9% 9.8 fps
Poor: 4% Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 950 PRO 512GB
295GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 831 888 837 851 863 550 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 1,522
Write 1,176
Mixed 752
SusWrite 803
237% 1,063 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 80.7
4K Mixed 46.6
154% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 692
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 461
360% 505 MB/s
Poor: 181%
This bench: 181%
Great: 294%
Nvme PC SN520 WDC 256GB
237GB free
Firmware: 20240012 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 568 424 420 428 433 434 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 879
Write 1,115
Mixed 1,046
SusWrite 451
197% 873 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 86.3
4K Mixed 48.2
158% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 743
DQ Write 583
DQ Mixed 624
478% 650 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 141%
Great: 176%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CMR8N-VK 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.7% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 11.5
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 11.5
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 91.4
44% 91.4 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical m17 R2 Builds (Compare 217 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware m17 R2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback