Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_R504ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive70.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_R504ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X505ZA
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '23 at 09:22
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Memory 64.5
1-Core 97
2-Core 159
62% 107 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 236
31% 231 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)
Asus(1043 1091) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.20.02
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.45% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 7.7
5% 7.27 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 11.3
7% 8.43 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.45%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MA031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 395 286 157 156 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 428
Write 372
Mixed 360
SusWrite 255
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 28.1
94% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 211
154% 202 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143EB1-CRC M471A5244BB0-CRC 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.7% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 25.7
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 19.6
66% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_R504ZA Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_R504ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback