Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 08 '23 at 03:50
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
CPU #000, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.6% Good
Memory 71.8
1-Core 72.9
2-Core 150
58% 98.3 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 513
48% 400 Pts
64-Core 563
35% 563 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID K280Q
Nvidia(10DE 113D) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 370.41
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Lighting 25.4
Reflection 26.8
Parallax 31.3
21% 27.8 fps
MRender 35.1
Gravity 24
Splatting 24.4
22% 27.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 275GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 91 90 103 94 95 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 16% Great: 67%
Vmware Virtual disk 3.5TB
411GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 100 84 98 101 96 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.3% Below average
Read 24.8
Write 132
Mixed 100
SusWrite 95.9
66% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 1.7
393% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 128 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
79.3% Very good
MC Read 38.8
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 32.2
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.5
23% 8.07 GB/s
Latency 97.3
41% 97.3 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback