QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics40.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory13.7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 13.7GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory9.5 GB free of 13.6719 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 09 '23 at 07:57
Run Duration78 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
12th Gen Intel Core i5-12400
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 5 cores, 10 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Memory 73.7
1-Core 161
2-Core 326
98% 187 Pts
4-Core 611
8-Core 1,015
99% 813 Pts
64-Core 1,102
68% 1,102 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Nvidia(10DE 1F82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.6% Average
Lighting 53
Reflection 53.2
Parallax 45.2
43% 50.5 fps
MRender 39.7
Gravity 47.7
Splatting 43.2
36% 43.5 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 140GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,284
Write 943
Mixed 997
308% 1,408 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 68.9
4K Mixed 47.2
160% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 630
DQ Write 616
DQ Mixed 581
448% 609 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x13GB
1 of 1 slots used
13GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
76.5% Very good
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 25.7
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 27.9
SC Mixed 22.6
64% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 93
43% 93 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback