Valve Jupiter

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive287% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemValve Jupiter  (all builds)
MotherboardValve Jupiter
Memory6.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display800 x 1280 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220321
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateMar 14 '23 at 12:33
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Custom APU 0405
FP6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Memory 43.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 195
61% 116 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 507
53% 425 Pts
64-Core 520
32% 520 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Custom GPU 0405
AMD(1002 0123) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.19.06
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Lighting 18
Reflection 25.4
Parallax 31.6
15% 25 fps
MRender 22.6
Gravity 20.3
Splatting 26.8
19% 23.2 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
E2m2 64GB 62GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10100080
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 18 17 17 25 23 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
287% Outstanding
Read 3,332
Write 27.4
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 18.1
175% 845 MB/s
4K Read 378
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 3.2
579% 128 MB/s
Poor: 287%
This bench: 287%
Great: 661%
SDXC 997GB
143GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 2.3 4.3 4.4 2.5 2.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,995
Write 1.7
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 3.2
358% 501 MB/s
4K Read 128
4K Mixed 0
7,994% 64 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MT62F1G32D4DR-031 WT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB 23h 4266 MHz clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
65.6% Good
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 28.4
70% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 18.4
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 186
22% 186 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Jupiter Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Valve Jupiter

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $419
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback