Asus M3A78-EM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 12%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 7.91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M3A78-EM  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101008
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 27 '17 at 23:26
Run Duration327 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9600
AM2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
7.91% Terrible
Memory 1.19
1-Core 28.1
2-Core 56.3
13% 28.5 Pts
4-Core 84.1
8-Core 80.6
11% 82.3 Pts
64-Core 120
7% 120 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 7.91%
Great: 26%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3200
Asus(1043 82F1) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.56% Terrible
Lighting 0.63
Reflection 1.38
Parallax 0.38
0% 0.8 fps
MRender 0.81
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 1.17
1% 0.73 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.56%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$30
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61130WD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.7% Below average
Read 196
Write 140
Mixed 139
35% 158 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 20.2
4K Mixed 9.47
52% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 23.2
DQ Write 27.4
DQ Mixed 8.91
11% 19.8 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 105%
Wl3000gs A6472E 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 01.0
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 24.8
Write 26.7
Mixed 25.1
19% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 2.72
4K Mixed 0.22
108% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 96%
WD WD2500BEVS-22UST0 250GB
175GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 49.5
Write 45.6
Mixed 17.9
28% 37.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.32
82% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 32%
WD WD1500HLFS-01G6U1 150GB
7GB free
Firmware: 04.04V02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 71.7
Write 73.1
Mixed 72
54% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 2.62
4K Mixed 0.61
151% 1.36 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
7GB free
Firmware: CC1H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 81.3
Write 79.7
Mixed 56.2
54% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.34
84% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 70%
ST925041 0AS 250GB
233GB free, PID b159
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.4% Very poor
Read 20.6
Write 20.8
Mixed 21.6
27% 21 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.23
4K Mixed 0.41
58% 0.74 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
16% Very poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 6.7
18% 6.2 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3.4
9% 3.07 GB/s
Latency 494
8% 494 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M3A78-EM Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M3A78-EM - $18

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback