Lenovo F0EB000NUK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo F0EB000NUK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 36FE
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190614
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '23 at 22:35
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8145U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Memory 3.44
1-Core 79.8
2-Core 123
33% 68.7 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 162
21% 160 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Legend(17AA 36FE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9316
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
2.86% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 6.8
3% 4.6 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 4
Splatting 0.1
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.86%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
855GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 5.8 6.9 8.5 6.2 6.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 52.6
Write 3
Mixed 7
SusWrite 6.6
12% 17.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
46% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD48GS880-32N2200 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 4.3
13% 4.7 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 2.8
8% 2.87 GB/s
Latency 469
8% 469 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F0EB000NUK Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo F0EB000NUK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 3% - Terrible Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback