Today's hottest deals

MSI Z170 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7984)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics38.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7984
MotherboardMSI Z170 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7984)  (all builds)
Memory53.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '23 at 15:54
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$93
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 92.3
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 387
53% 392 Pts
64-Core 399
25% 399 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380X-$120
CLim: 1090 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Lighting 50.1
Reflection 48
Parallax 63.2
41% 53.8 fps
MRender 47.7
Gravity 50.7
Splatting 33.5
35% 44 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TB
622GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 420
Write 394
Mixed 372
88% 395 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 35.1
120% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 270
214% 299 MB/s
Poor: 86% Great: 123%
Jmicron Tech 250GB
20GB free
Firmware: 3202
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 275
Write 345
Mixed 293
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 33.3
4K Mixed 23.8
77% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 128
101% 140 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 82%
Seagate ST12000NM0007-2A1101 12TB
2TB free
Firmware: SN02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 197
Write 181
Mixed 104
119% 161 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 1.1
322% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 135%
JMicron Generic DISK02 3TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,136
Write 29.6
Mixed 59.8
1,174% 1,742 MB/s
4K Read 414
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 3.9
1,735% 140 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 65%
JMicron Generic DISK03 4TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5059
Write 4
Mixed 9.2
1,116% 1,691 MB/s
4K Read 425
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.8
1,617% 142 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 53%
WD easystore 25FB 4TB
3TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,570
Write 16.9
Mixed 28.7
1,027% 1,538 MB/s
4K Read 428
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2.6
1,715% 144 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 71%
JMicron Generic DISK04 16TB
6TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 29 31 29 30 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 191
Write 175
Mixed 94.4
SusWrite 30.3
152% 123 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 1.5
400% 7.63 MB/s
DQ Read 4.1
DQ Write 10.3
DQ Mixed 1.5
417% 5.3 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 104%
JMicron Generic DISK01 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 6.1 5.7 5 5.1 6.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 57%
JMicron Generic 4TB
852GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 3.7 4.7 3.8 3.7 4.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL16G32C16U4BL.M16FE 859B BL16G32C16U4BL.M8FB1 859B BL16G32C16U4BL.M8FB1 859B BL16G32C16U4BL.M16FE 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
100% Outstanding
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 41.3
MC Mixed 32.9
104% 36.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 38.1
SC Mixed 29.3
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7984) Builds (Compare 149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z170 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7984)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $509
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback