Lenovo 30BBSC9R00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 30BBSC9R00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1037
Memory245.2 GB free of 256 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 05 '23 at 18:58
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 5218
CPU0, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 57.6
1-Core 110
2-Core 220
69% 129 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 759
68% 576 Pts
64-Core 3,529
218% 3,529 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia T400 4GB
Legend(17AA 1613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Lighting 21.8
Reflection 24.4
Parallax 20.4
18% 22.2 fps
MRender 26.4
Gravity 19.7
Splatting 22.8
19% 23 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
777GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2037 1978 1840 1867 1852 1855 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 2,050
Write 2,133
Mixed 1,715
SusWrite 1,905
440% 1,951 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 18.8
4K Mixed 17.2
55% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 584
DQ Write 436
DQ Mixed 482
368% 501 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 238%
Great: 372%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-3G2R1 8x31.9GB
8 of 12 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.3% Very good
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 29.6
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 410%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30BBSC9R00 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 30BBSC9R00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback