ADD TO PC
BUILD

Siemens SIMATIC IPC427E

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	84% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Siemens SIMATIC IPC427E (all builds)
Motherboard	SIEMENS A5E36514794
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160907
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 01 '17 at 05:14
Run Duration	322 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1505L v5 14 User benchmarks, average bench 58% no information, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	70% Very good	Memory 85.8 1-Core 84.9 2-Core 170 67% 114 Pts	4-Core 295 8-Core 420 45% 358 Pts	64-Core 421 26% 421 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD P530 (Server Skylake) 5,499 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Intel(8086 191D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4565 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	6.09% Terrible	Lighting 6.43 Reflection 9.77 Parallax 6.47 5% 7.56 fps	MRender 7.43 Gravity 5.73 Splatting 13.5 8% 8.88 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.09% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_5 100_MTFDDAK240TC 240GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: D0M Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 29 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 25 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 22 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 22 (C2) HDA temperature 69 53 201864773663 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 55955522 (F7) Unknown 100 100 1759222 (F8) Unknown 100 100 105743 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4652 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	84% Excellent	Read 496 Write 271 Mixed 344 82% 370 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 121 4K Mixed 24 129% 55.8 MB/s	DQ Read 169 DQ Write 262 DQ Mixed 35 77% 155 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 91%
VendorCo ProductCode 8GB 4,860 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 6GB free, PID 5678 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	2.77% Terrible	Read 10.6 Write 3.35 Mixed 4.82 7% 6.26 MB/s	4K Read 2.06 4K Write 0.003 4K Mixed 0.004 8% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.77% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CPB 1x8GB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	40% Below average	MC Read 15 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 10.3 37% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 12.8 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 71.4 56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical SIMATIC IPC427E Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Siemens SIMATIC IPC427E

CPU
Xeon E3-1505L v5IntelBench 58%, 14 samples	3x
Core i5-6442EQIntelBench 61%, 13 samples	1x

GPU
HD P530 (Server Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 5,499 samples	3x
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	1x

SSD
100_MTFDDAK240TC 240GBMicron_5Bench 83%, 9 samples	1x
SD8TB8U256G1001 256GBSandiskBench 73%, 4,613 samples	1x
Micron_5100_MTFDDAK240TCB 240GBBench 76%, 109 samples	1x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 1x8GBMicronBench 36%, 24,227 samples	2x
M471A2K43EB1-CWE 1x16GBSamsungBench 46%, 7,758 samples	1x
M471A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GBSamsungBench 40%, 36,753 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback