Today's hottest deals

Asus STRIX H270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive215% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus STRIX H270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170707
Uptime8.5 Days
Run DateDec 02 '17 at 18:25
Run Duration371 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$166
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 92.4
1-Core 140
2-Core 267
93% 166 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 737
76% 612 Pts
64-Core 745
46% 745 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Gainward(10B0 1189) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
28.6% Poor
Lighting 33.3
Reflection 33.4
Parallax 41.5
27% 36.1 fps
MRender 46.3
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 33.7
32% 39.3 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$87
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 1,529
Write 1,056
Mixed 1,061
269% 1,215 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 41.9
190% 68.8 MB/s
DQ Read 878
DQ Write 604
DQ Mixed 259
323% 580 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 215%
Great: 236%
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149
56GB free
Firmware: DC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 494
Write 231
Mixed 319
77% 348 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 98
4K Mixed 21.5
129% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 53.3
93% 184 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 91%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 160
Write 118
Mixed 98.2
151% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 2.45
4K Mixed 0.19
92% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 59%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 93.9
Write 99.9
Mixed 67.4
110% 87.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.31
67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 40%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00MMMB0 3TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 105
Write 90.7
Mixed 64.9
107% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.18
67% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 50%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00MMMB0 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 104
Write 83.3
Mixed 67.3
104% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.22
69% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 50%
WDC WD10 EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
880GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 73.8
Write 74.8
Mixed 56.9
87% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 2.12
4K Mixed 0.33
85% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 34%
ST320006 44NS 2TB
288GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 91.3
Write 83.7
Mixed 74.7
105% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.46
80% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 45%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00DC0B0 2TB
187GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 72.5
Write 83.3
Mixed 51.8
88% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 2.29
4K Mixed 0.25
88% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 57%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68AX9N0 3TB
46GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 109
Write 100
Mixed 70.1
115% 93 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 2.29
4K Mixed 0.23
87% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.3% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 21.1
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 23.3
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX H270F GAMING Builds (Compare 1,914 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus STRIX H270F GAMING - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $672
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback