Today's hottest deals

Positivo POS-PIQ67CG

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPositivo POS-PIQ67CG  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo POS-PIQ67CG
Memory1.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20111103
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 21 '23 at 14:19
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31220
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 74.4
1-Core 66.1
2-Core 147
56% 96 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 221
25% 196 Pts
64-Core 232
14% 232 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Gigabyte(1458 3642) 2GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 531.68
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 17.2
Parallax 16.9
15% 17.7 fps
MRender 22.7
Gravity 18.8
Splatting 15.6
15% 19 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 250GB-$44
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GM2OA5CA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 17 13 15 20 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 47.6
Write 63.5
Mixed 18.2
SusWrite 19.8
27% 37.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
56% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 50%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
104GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 73 85 77 83 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 38.5
Write 65.5
Mixed 40.2
SusWrite 78.2
41% 55.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix CENTRIUM 10/2013 SH564568FH8N0QHSCR 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.7% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 8.1
24% 8.43 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 6.2
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical POS-PIQ67CG Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo POS-PIQ67CG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $384
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback