Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IC_FA506IC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IC_FA506IC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA506IC
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 26 '23 at 10:38
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Memory 64.9
1-Core 130
2-Core 180
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 281
30% 237 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 11DC) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.4.2
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.5% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 30
Parallax 5.2
2% 12.5 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 9
7% 8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 3.5%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00BTW 512GB
366GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 503 375 472 521 690 666 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 732
Write 510
Mixed 583
SusWrite 538
132% 591 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 25.8
4K Mixed 19.5
75% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 205
142% 178 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 229%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
39.6% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 12.3
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 10.7
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IC_FA506IC Builds (Compare 802 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IC_FA506IC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback