Today's hottest deals

Nutanix AHV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory9GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 9GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNutanix AHV  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory2 GB free of 9 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateApr 27 '23 at 20:20
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6226
CPU 0, 4 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 28.8
2-Core 22.4
14% 25.6 Pts
4-Core 44.1
8-Core 65.2
7% 54.6 Pts
64-Core 14
1% 14 Pts
Poor: 44% Great: 76%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nutanix VDISK 118GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 15 11 19 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.9% Below average
Read 96.3
Write 17.7
Mixed 31
SusWrite 14.7
29% 39.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
120% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Red Hat 1x9GB
1 of 1 slots used
9GB DIMM RAM
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
4.89% Terrible
MC Read 1.1
MC Write 2.4
MC Mixed 2.1
5% 1.87 GB/s
SC Read 0.8
SC Write 0.8
SC Mixed 0.6
2% 0.73 GB/s
Latency 878
5% 878 ns
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.89%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AHV Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Nutanix AHV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback