Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics7.98% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '23 at 11:05
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11600K-$181
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Memory 79.1
1-Core 161
2-Core 314
98% 185 Pts
4-Core 579
8-Core 930
93% 754 Pts
64-Core 1,116
69% 1,116 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 750
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9127
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
7.98% Terrible
Lighting 9.5
Reflection 104
Parallax 10.6
8% 41.2 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 10.4
Splatting 9.1
8% 10.5 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.98%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot M.2 P300 256GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFMD1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,163
Write 1,584
Mixed 1,246
299% 1,331 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 61.4
207% 75 MB/s
DQ Read 1,528
DQ Write 1,272
DQ Mixed 1,219
962% 1,340 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 225%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$34
752GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 169 165 172 174 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 164
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 169
96% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
145% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GU6CJR6N-XN 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
74.7% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 27.1
80% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 18.7
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,172 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $433
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback