Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82FG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82FG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221008
Uptime16 Days
Run DateApr 30 '23 at 20:04
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 69
1-Core 134
2-Core 226
79% 143 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 289
47% 336 Pts
64-Core 308
19% 308 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX450
Legend(17AA 3F88) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1236
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.5% Poor
Lighting 28.5
Reflection 24.8
Parallax 27.5
23% 26.9 fps
MRender 24.4
Gravity 37.2
Splatting 26.8
24% 29.5 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0011P6LN Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 230 62 129 63 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 909
Write 730
Mixed 647
SusWrite 102
133% 597 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 43.9
131% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 481
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 96.6
128% 241 MB/s
Poor: 97%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 229%
Samsung PSSD T7 Touch 1TB
618GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 306 315 325 341 342 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 264
Write 294
Mixed 292
SusWrite 322
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 24.2
4K Mixed 16.8
55% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 141
104% 136 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.9% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 19.7
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 30.1
SC Mixed 14.2
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82FG Builds (Compare 2,475 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82FG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback