Asus KGP(M)E-D16

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus KGP(M)E-D16  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK KGP(M)E-D16
Memory57.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160616
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 30 '23 at 21:49
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Opteron 6274
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
48.2% Average
Memory 69.6
1-Core 51
2-Core 95.7
46% 72.1 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 291
26% 219 Pts
64-Core 850
53% 850 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 20.9
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 19.6
17% 19.3 fps
MRender 24.4
Gravity 22.5
Splatting 16.4
17% 21.1 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$110
555GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 63 66 69 60 58 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.4% Below average
Read 216
Write 74.8
Mixed 105
SusWrite 63
25% 115 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 29.2
4K Mixed 14.8
53% 18.7 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 9
DQ Mixed 9.2
25% 56.7 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 128%
Jmicron Generic 500GB
423GB free
Firmware: 0202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 154 170 165 166 169 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.3% Average
Read 242
Write 160
Mixed 169
SusWrite 165
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 20.4
4K Mixed 18.8
57% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 80.9
DQ Write 72.7
DQ Mixed 71
55% 74.9 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 91%
LSI MRSASRoMB-8i 999GB
285GB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 524 469 506 511 513 519 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
LSI MRSASRoMB-8i 4TB
460GB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 114 131 123 178 186 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57% Above average
Read 47.6
Write 127
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 151
71% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.8% Below average
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 12.7
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9.8
22% 7.87 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical KGP(M)E-D16 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus KGP(M)E-D16

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 3% - Terrible Total price: $503
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback