Clevo M7X0SU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemClevo M7X0SU  (all builds)
Motherboardclevo M7X0SU
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date27921107
Uptime5.7 Days
Run DateDec 04 '17 at 10:33
Run Duration425 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Dual T3400-$70
uPGA 479M, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Memory 45.5
1-Core 24.8
2-Core 49.1
26% 39.8 Pts
4-Core 48.7
8-Core 49.2
6% 49 Pts
64-Core 48.8
3% 48.8 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9300M GS
Clevo(1558 0802) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.56% Terrible
Lighting 0.63
Reflection 1.23
Parallax 0.41
0% 0.76 fps
MRender 1.52
Gravity 0.23
Splatting 0.74
1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.56%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM71.1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.6% Poor
Read 115
Write 75.5
Mixed 88.6
21% 93 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 32.4
4K Mixed 5.69
48% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 23.8
DQ Write 51.7
DQ Mixed 5.76
14% 27.1 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 83%
SecureDigital_MMC_Drive 2GB
2GB free
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.15% Terrible
Read 13.6
Write 3.65
Mixed 5.72
6% 7.67 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
90% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 5.15%
Great: 5%
TOSHIBA MK3252GSX 320GB
286GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 23.9
Write 18.8
Mixed 9
20% 17.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.24
4K Mixed 0.28
54% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
9.69% Terrible
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 2.3
8% 2.87 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 3.3
9% 3.23 GB/s
Latency 178
22% 178 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.69%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M7X0SU Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Clevo M7X0SU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $99
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback