MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 167%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 170%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive334% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
13 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory43.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '23 at 16:43
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$162
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 93.5
1-Core 179
2-Core 357
112% 210 Pts
4-Core 704
8-Core 1,376
123% 1040 Pts
64-Core 1,629
101% 1,629 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 113%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Gigabyte(1458 404E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 219
Reflection 202
Parallax 194
179% 205 fps
MRender 196
Gravity 147
Splatting 130
126% 158 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 149%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
408GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2265 839 839 840 843 837 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
334% Outstanding
Read 2,665
Write 2484
Mixed 1,875
SusWrite 1,077
453% 2,025 MB/s
4K Read 70
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 97.6
331% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,467
DQ Write 1,174
DQ Mixed 1,278
968% 1,306 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 334%
Great: 346%
Amd-raid Array 2 960GB
894GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 69 71 75 72 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 246
Write 491
Mixed 293
SusWrite 71.5
62% 275 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 81.3
4K Mixed 33.8
123% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 98.8
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 102
110% 176 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 88%
Amd-raid Array 3 999GB
930GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 68 69 73 70 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 216
Write 187
Mixed 105
SusWrite 69.8
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1.2
265% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 150%
Amd-raid Array 4 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 68 72 69 69 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 134
Write 152
Mixed 97.8
SusWrite 68.7
84% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.5
179% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 48GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 34.7
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 32.3
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 35.6
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,668 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $898
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback