Today's hottest deals

Microelectronics G708

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 125%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicroelectronics G708  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock X570 Pro4
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1842 x 1036 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1842 x 1036 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '23 at 23:37
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$159
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 84.4
1-Core 157
2-Core 325
101% 189 Pts
4-Core 641
8-Core 1,027
102% 834 Pts
64-Core 1,417
88% 1,417 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 102%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Asus(1043 883E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.61
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 176
Reflection 175
Parallax 160
144% 170 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 136
Splatting 119
117% 147 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 128%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 148 100 224 179 115 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 627
Write 379
Mixed 356
SusWrite 166
85% 382 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 22.7
116% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 784
DQ Write 70.6
DQ Mixed 333
267% 396 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 300%
Seagate SkyHawk 6TB (2016)-$145
947GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 36 15 19 21 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 15.7
Write 22
Mixed 14.2
SusWrite 20.8
13% 18.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
24% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 108%
WD My Passport 2627 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 39 33 33 35 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 35.7
Mixed 18
SusWrite 32.8
40% 29.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.2
31% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 14%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMUD416F82-3200D 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.9% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 27.5
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 25.6
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G708 Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

System: Microelectronics G708

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $619
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback