Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory248.8 GB free of 256 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '23 at 11:01
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Common KVM processor
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 64 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
43.6% Average
Memory 37.2
1-Core 40.3
2-Core 94.8
32% 57.4 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 419
42% 344 Pts
64-Core 1,150
71% 1,150 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 98%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 1.5TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 0 125 150 175 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.6% Below average
Read 410
Write 414
Mixed 525
SusWrite 164
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 6.8
32% 9.53 MB/s
DQ Read 33.9
DQ Write 39.2
DQ Mixed 38.6
28% 37.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 16x16GB
16 of 16 slots used
256GB DIMM RAM
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
76.2% Very good
MC Read 64.2
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 16.8
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 7
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 216
18% 216 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 273%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback