bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230111
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 18 '23 at 23:15
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6338
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Memory 19.2
1-Core 47.1
2-Core 106
29% 57.4 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 448
40% 338 Pts
64-Core 639
40% 639 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia A40-4Q
Nvidia(10DE 14DA) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
49% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
49% 60 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60
Splatting 60
49% 60 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 70GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 1.1 0.8 2.1 1.9 2.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 163
Write 104
Mixed 132
SusWrite 1.5
75% 100 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 5.6
915% 5.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 79%
Pure FlashArray 107GB
76GB free
Firmware: 8888
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 195 190 195 196 201 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
127% Outstanding
Read 245
Write 214
Mixed 201
SusWrite 197
159% 214 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 5.8
929% 4.97 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 127%
Great: 127%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 66 71 116 124 128 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-8192MB Virtual RAM VMW-4096MB 12GB
0, 0 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
89.6% Excellent
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 48.7
MC Mixed 41.6
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 9.4
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 327
12% 327 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback