Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics74.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive329% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
16 months ago, 15 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory54.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 24 '23 at 20:08
Run Duration317 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$335
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
88% Excellent
Memory 72.2
1-Core 144
2-Core 280
88% 166 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 1,062
96% 808 Pts
64-Core 2110
131% 2110 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$243
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.61
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.9% Very good
Lighting 102
Reflection 82.6
Parallax 88.6
83% 91.2 fps
MRender 83.1
Gravity 70.9
Splatting 63.5
58% 72.5 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$140
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1372 1483 1600 1659 1627 1634 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
329% Outstanding
Read 2,395
Write 1,606
Mixed 1,630
SusWrite 1,562
402% 1,798 MB/s
4K Read 60.5
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 85.1
278% 97.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,266
DQ Write 1,048
DQ Mixed 1147
862% 1,154 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 329%
Great: 435%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 392 377 401 396 394 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 491
Write 402
Mixed 345
SusWrite 386
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 53.5
4K Mixed 27.6
108% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 59.2
DQ Mixed 76.9
61% 87.4 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 117%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
466GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 426 435 454 454 454 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 434
Mixed 395
SusWrite 435
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 87.6
4K Mixed 54.3
180% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 198
149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 112%
Great: 134%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB
293GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 107 105 105 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 103
Write 107
Mixed 90.6
SusWrite 104
138% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 59%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
153GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 0 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 70.5
Write 62.8
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 0
64% 50.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
106% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 61%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB
1TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 75 76 76 76 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 77.4
Write 79.7
Mixed 68.9
SusWrite 75.7
103% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
105% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 43%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
928GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 107 105 105 92 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 112
Write 129
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 104
134% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
74% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 47%
LaCie d2 quadra 4TB
256GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 43 42 43 43 42 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.2% Very poor
Read 38
Write 41.1
Mixed 29.6
SusWrite 42.2
52% 37.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.3
50% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 18%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
4TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 75 76 75 76 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 115
Write 90
Mixed 105
SusWrite 75.7
128% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.7
196% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 73%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00RWYB1 6TB
4TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Read 142
Write 139
Mixed 113
SusWrite 0
125% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
133% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 62%
LaCie d2 quadra 4TB
863GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 44 44 44 44 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.3% Poor
Read 39.5
Write 43
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 43.9
54% 39.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
127% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 30.5
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 29.5
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 96.3
42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,639 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $851
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback