Today's hottest deals

Amazon g4dn.2xlarge

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive13.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAmazon g4dn.2xlarge  (all builds)
MotherboardAmazon
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 31 '23 at 08:26
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8259CL
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Memory 51.4
1-Core 44
2-Core 82.8
36% 59.4 Pts
4-Core 129
8-Core 301
25% 215 Pts
64-Core 314
19% 314 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 75%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 54GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 58 54 66 86 54 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
13.7% Very poor
Read 188
Write 81.6
Mixed 126
SusWrite 63.1
25% 115 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 2
8% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 292%
Nvme Amazon EC2 NVMe 225GB
145GB free
Firmware: 0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 157 154 156 155 155 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 465
Write 233
Mixed 370
SusWrite 158
68% 307 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 28.6
4K Mixed 14.3
50% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 311
216% 270 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x31GB
1 of 1 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
39.7% Below average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 14.3
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 3
9% 3.23 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 241%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical g4dn.2xlarge Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

System: Amazon g4dn.2xlarge

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback