Gigabyte GA-Z590 UD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics72.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z590 UD  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230110
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 31 '23 at 11:24
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700-$216
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Memory 80.5
1-Core 166
2-Core 324
101% 190 Pts
4-Core 602
8-Core 1140
104% 871 Pts
64-Core 1,534
95% 1,534 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$230
CLim: 2197 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.7% Very good
Lighting 110
Reflection 89.6
Parallax 96.1
90% 98.7 fps
MRender 87.8
Gravity 77.6
Splatting 0.3
39% 55.2 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 647 332 331 332 332 329 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 2387
Write 1,420
Mixed 1,117
SusWrite 384
293% 1,327 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 65.6
216% 73.5 MB/s
DQ Read 982
DQ Write 967
DQ Mixed 1,008
748% 986 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 229%
Great: 280%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
253GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2121 2123 2097 2141 2142 2100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
350% Outstanding
Read 2,521
Write 2,157
Mixed 1,206
SusWrite 2,121
449% 2,001 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 63.4
211% 73.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,355
DQ Write 1,088
DQ Mixed 1,192
900% 1,212 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 350%
Great: 393%
Seagate ST3500418AS 485GB
58GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 70 68 68 69 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 82.5
Write 80.6
Mixed 54.4
SusWrite 69.2
53% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 72%
ADATA HD650 1TB
123GB free, PID a35a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 58 58 53 56 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 50.3
Write 79
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 56.8
97% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.5
137% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.4% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 22.1
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 23.9
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z590 UD Builds (Compare 1,537 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z590 UD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $700
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback