Acer Aspire V3-772

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire V3-772  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer VA70_HW
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131011
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateDec 10 '17 at 13:28
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 90.1
2-Core 153
68% 111 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 236
32% 236 Pts
64-Core 236
15% 236 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Acer(1025 0781) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4248
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.68% Terrible
Lighting 3.93
Reflection 12.4
Parallax 6.38
3% 7.56 fps
MRender 6.81
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.22
5% 5.46 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.68%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX003J Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 76.9
Write 79.4
Mixed 65.7
56% 74 MB/s
4K Read 0.23
4K Write 1.12
4K Mixed 0.17
49% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 57%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 80GB
5GB free
Firmware: 891F Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.5% Poor
Read 42.5
Write 42.8
Mixed 40.8
32% 42 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 0.96
4K Mixed 0.22
61% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1NBG/4G Adata AM1U16BC4P2-B19H 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.1% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 17.3
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V3-772 Builds (Compare 418 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-772

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback