Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507NV_FA507NV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics19.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507NV_FA507NV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA507NV
Memory21.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230315
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 19 '23 at 10:04
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 81.5
1-Core 130
2-Core 240
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 800
74% 620 Pts
64-Core 916
57% 916 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 19DD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.01.33
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
19.1% Very poor
Lighting 24.4
Reflection 47.1
Parallax 33.8
20% 35.1 fps
MRender 20.3
Gravity 28.5
Splatting 16.9
18% 21.9 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB
339GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA003
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1048
Write 1,092
Mixed 893
226% 1,011 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 21.6
107% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 826
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 758
516% 645 MB/s
Poor: 124% Great: 252%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 731030WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,487
Write 1,262
Mixed 1,150
289% 1,300 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 69.2
4K Mixed 42.5
150% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1074
DQ Write 386
DQ Mixed 786
566% 749 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 507%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM4800ASE-16G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
115% Outstanding
MC Read 40.5
MC Write 48.7
MC Mixed 41
124% 43.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 40
SC Mixed 23.8
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 115%
This bench: 115%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507NV_FA507NV Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507NV_FA507NV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback