Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 225%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 247%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics213% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR  (all builds)
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 22 '23 at 02:55
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$241
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 172
2-Core 335
108% 200 Pts
4-Core 659
8-Core 1290
115% 974 Pts
64-Core 2,141
132% 2,141 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
Device(107D 27A1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
213% Outstanding
Lighting 314
Reflection 295
Parallax 378
256% 329 fps
MRender 352
Gravity 258
Splatting 191
210% 267 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 213%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
810GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 380 398 415 415 415 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 503
Write 408
Mixed 404
SusWrite 402
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 70.4
4K Mixed 0.5
80% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 26.9
DQ Mixed 0.5
23% 59.4 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 100%
S3SSDD2T0 2TB
750GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A7T25A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1033 1232 848 729 729 731 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
261% Outstanding
Read 2,355
Write 1,506
Mixed 1,395
SusWrite 884
341% 1,535 MB/s
4K Read 57.4
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 76.2
248% 84.6 MB/s
DQ Read 950
DQ Write 646
DQ Mixed 616
509% 737 MB/s
Poor: 261%
This bench: 261%
Great: 368%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$122
896GB free
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1864 1878 345 89 91 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1144
Write 1,866
Mixed 1,317
SusWrite 726
286% 1,263 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 63.4
213% 74.7 MB/s
DQ Read 870
DQ Write 660
DQ Mixed 777
578% 769 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 190%
Great: 307%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
447GB free
Firmware: 0320
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 399 240 68 67 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 427
Write 400
Mixed 329
SusWrite 206
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 28
93% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 0.6
30% 71.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C16D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
137% Outstanding
MC Read 61.7
MC Write 45.9
MC Mixed 46.8
147% 51.5 GB/s
SC Read 31.7
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 41.5
96% 33.5 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 137%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR Builds (Compare 831 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $620
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback