Asus PRIME B350M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME B350M-E  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171109
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 11 '17 at 07:08
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 76
1-Core 116
2-Core 230
78% 141 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 438
58% 434 Pts
64-Core 443
27% 443 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Lighting 19.3
Reflection 15.1
Parallax 18
16% 17.5 fps
MRender 15.9
Gravity 18.4
Splatting 19.9
15% 18.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX300 240GB-$43
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M2CR010 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 521
Write 406
Mixed 423
100% 450 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 17.2
99% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 28.8
DQ Write 62.3
DQ Mixed 17.1
21% 36.1 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 114%
Oyen Digi USB3.0 500GB
410GB free
Firmware: 0117
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.9% Good
Read 113
Write 110
Mixed 95.5
80% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.14
51% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 64%
Hammer Morespace 1TB
730GB free, PID 3070
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 38
Write 38.8
Mixed 38.3
50% 38.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.36
78% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 21%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB
19GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 139
Write 55.9
Mixed 63.5
94% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.57
86% 2.06 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSEK.8FBD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15.7
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 15.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B350M-E Builds (Compare 275 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B350M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $266
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback