Lenovo 80EC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemLenovo 80EC  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 5B3
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '23 at 20:31
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 79%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-7500 APU (2014 M.Ka)
Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
22.4% Poor
Memory 32.7
1-Core 24
2-Core 46.6
22% 34.4 Pts
4-Core 67.2
8-Core 92.5
10% 79.8 Pts
64-Core 97.1
6% 97.1 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3988) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
3.33% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 5.9
Parallax 5.8
3% 5.1 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 5.4
4% 4.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.33%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigastone SSD 1TB
918GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1205A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 262 211 235 284 318 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 305
Write 182
Mixed 236
SusWrite 253
55% 244 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 23
4K Mixed 13.4
51% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 47.6
61% 109 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73BH0-YK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
13.7% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 5.3
14% 4.93 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 3.2
8% 2.77 GB/s
Latency 240
17% 240 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80EC Builds (Compare 233 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80EC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback