Lenovo 82JM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics88.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82JM  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220816
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJun 25 '23 at 12:43
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 77.6
1-Core 146
2-Core 274
90% 166 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 830
81% 663 Pts
64-Core 923
57% 923 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Legend(17AA 3F82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.5% Excellent
Lighting 115
Reflection 116
Parallax 123
94% 118 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 91.1
Splatting 79.9
78% 98 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ512HBLU-00BL2 512GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7L2QFXM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1583 616 234 184 181 217 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1550
Write 1,657
Mixed 1,491
SusWrite 503
292% 1,300 MB/s
4K Read 51.3
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 75.6
261% 96.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,056
DQ Write 1,175
DQ Mixed 1,150
856% 1,127 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 223%
Great: 227%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 500GB
446GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 108 108 109 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 110
Write 100
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 108
68% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
38.3% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 10.6
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 12
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82JM Builds (Compare 479 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

System: Lenovo 82JM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback