Today's hottest deals

Asus ZenBook UX434FLC_UX434FL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (1st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 99 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus ZenBook UX434FLC_UX434FL  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX434FLC
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display504 x 1000 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '23 at 00:55
Run Duration328 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 0.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Memory 35.4
1-Core 5.5
2-Core 10.4
14% 17.1 Pts
4-Core 22.4
8-Core 28.8
3% 25.6 Pts
64-Core 22.1
1% 22.1 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 150F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9268
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.87% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 1.3
1% 6.3 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 1.3
1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.87%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2200_MTFDHBA1T0TCK 1TB
716GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 43 46 44 44 45 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.4% Poor
Read 43.4
Write 47
Mixed 48.6
SusWrite 43.8
34% 45.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 2.2
378% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 25%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
1GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 14
Write 12.7
Mixed 12
16% 12.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
64% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4EBE304ED-EGCG 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 3.2
13% 4.53 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 1.6
6% 2.03 GB/s
Latency 225
18% 225 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 59 46 60 14" 1280 720 AUO323D
Typical ZenBook UX434FLC_UX434FL Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ZenBook UX434FLC_UX434FL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback