Asrock Z370 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics146% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z370 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180321
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateJul 22 '23 at 17:31
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 92
1-Core 130
2-Core 261
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 800
74% 620 Pts
64-Core 1,026
64% 1,026 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Asus(1043 87BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.29
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
146% Outstanding
Lighting 211
Reflection 203
Parallax 192
172% 202 fps
MRender 195
Gravity 151
Splatting 135
128% 160 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 146%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 259 240 232 222 213 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 480
Mixed 412
SusWrite 240
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 92.3
4K Mixed 57
189% 64.5 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 228
207% 316 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 110%
Great: 128%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$89
931GB free
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1697 1749 1781 1823 1824 1844 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
276% Outstanding
Read 1,277
Write 1,567
Mixed 1,342
SusWrite 1,786
338% 1,493 MB/s
4K Read 52.1
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 69.9
227% 77.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,068
DQ Write 943
DQ Mixed 974
739% 995 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 276%
Great: 365%
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 234200WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2223 2426 2426 2426 2419 2424 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
356% Outstanding
Read 2,195
Write 2,336
Mixed 2,154
SusWrite 2,391
513% 2,269 MB/s
4K Read 53.9
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 66.9
230% 79.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1239
DQ Write 1,063
DQ Mixed 1,120
848% 1,141 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 356%
Great: 469%
ST2000LM 015-2E8174 2TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 121 118 128 128 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 113
Write 125
Mixed 77
SusWrite 122
149% 109 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
103% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 49%
TOSHIBA HDWD130 3TB
35GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 0.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 152
Write 139
Mixed 32
SusWrite 1.3
94% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
99% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 72%
WDC WD20 EURS-63SPKY0 2TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 121 118 128 128 130 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.1% Average
Read 132
Write 129
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 122
142% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
34% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 4000 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.7% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 23
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 25.2
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 75 33.1" 1280 720 AOC3279 Q3279WG5B
Typical Z370 Pro4 Builds (Compare 4,185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Pro4 - $95

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $502
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback