Gigabyte GA-Z790 UD AC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 520%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 129%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 685%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 133%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics411% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z790 UD AC  (all builds)
Memory23.4 GB free of 32 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '23 at 23:23
Run Duration445 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900KF-$410
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Memory 94
1-Core 235
2-Core 457
136% 262 Pts
4-Core 922
8-Core 1,790
161% 1,356 Pts
64-Core 4,303
266% 4,303 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 133%
Great: 134%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,500
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
411% Outstanding
Lighting 667
Reflection 604
Parallax 811
544% 694 fps
MRender 550
Gravity 594
Splatting 313
380% 486 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 411%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$110
753GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 478 485 486 214 141 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 485
Mixed 446
SusWrite 381
103% 456 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 59.6
208% 77.5 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 341
257% 345 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 124%
Great: 128%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$171
2TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3271 3262 3261 3262 3262 3252 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
519% Outstanding
Read 2,696
Write 3,254
Mixed 2,980
SusWrite 3,262
690% 3,048 MB/s
4K Read 77.9
4K Write 220
4K Mixed 119
387% 139 MB/s
DQ Read 2182
DQ Write 1,956
DQ Mixed 2,059
1,547% 2,066 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 519%
Great: 508%
Samsung 870 QVO 8TB-$569
5.5TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 908 500 501 365 634 500 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 129%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$171
2TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3417 3236 3240 3223 3225 3214 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
525% Outstanding
Read 2,851
Write 3,254
Mixed 2995
SusWrite 3,259
699% 3,090 MB/s
4K Read 78
4K Write 220
4K Mixed 116
383% 138 MB/s
DQ Read 2,200
DQ Write 1,976
DQ Mixed 2,067
1,556% 2081 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 525%
Great: 508%
AGAMMIXS70B-4T-CS 4TB
4TB free
Firmware: 3.2.F.74
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4561 4600 4608 4613 4647 4646 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
601% Outstanding
Read 2,394
Write 4,707
Mixed 3,062
SusWrite 4,612
842% 3,694 MB/s
4K Read 80
4K Write 254
4K Mixed 122
412% 152 MB/s
DQ Read 2,298
DQ Write 2,002
DQ Mixed 2,181
1,626% 2,160 MB/s
Poor: 259%
This bench: 601%
Great: 601%
XPG GAMMIX S70 BLADE 4TB
4TB free
Firmware: 3.2.F.74
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,529
Write 5296
Mixed 3,327
842% 3,718 MB/s
4K Read 93.1
4K Write 285
4K Mixed 141
472% 173 MB/s
DQ Read 2,280
DQ Write 1,995
DQ Mixed 2178
1,622% 2,151 MB/s
Poor: 282% Great: 630%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 44.9
MC Write 42.2
MC Mixed 41.1
122% 42.7 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 38.3
SC Mixed 29.9
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 116%
Great: 192%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 36: 0P 1R 10G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
36% 40% 30 530 425 60 72.3" 2194 1234 GSMC0C8 LG TV SSCR2
History: Score 28: 0P 2R 3G 9B | Score 36: 0P 1R 10G 1B
Typical GA-Z790 UD AC Builds (Compare 1,842 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 291%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 346%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z790 UD AC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $1,383
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback