Notebook NS5x_NS7xPU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.88% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemNotebook NS5x_NS7xPU  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook NS5x_NS7xPU
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 08 '23 at 14:13
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1240P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 48.4
1-Core 116
2-Core 215
67% 126 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 552
57% 458 Pts
64-Core 823
51% 823 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Clevo(1558 7716) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3358
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
7.88% Terrible
Lighting 8.2
Reflection 12.6
Parallax 9.2
7% 10 fps
MRender 11.8
Gravity 16.5
Splatting 10
10% 12.8 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 7.88%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$90
290GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,134
Write 822
Mixed 866
209% 941 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 47.5
4K Mixed 30.4
118% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 340
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 259
190% 254 MB/s
Poor: 210% Great: 429%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Wilk Elektronik S.A. GR3200S464L22S/16G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
74.8% Very good
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 28.4
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 18.1
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 167
24% 167 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE07D8
Typical NS5x_NS7xPU Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Notebook NS5x_NS7xPU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback