GPD G1621-02

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive87.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGPD G1621-02  (all builds)
MotherboardGPD G1621-02
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1200 x 1920 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220107
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 13 '23 at 23:56
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver N6000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Memory 43.2
1-Core 78.9
2-Core 150
49% 90.6 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 240
27% 211 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin SSD 512GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 52BFU4MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 511 253 255 252 230 302 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 727
Write 604
Mixed 613
SusWrite 301
126% 561 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 36.7
4K Mixed 26.4
86% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 282
213% 290 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 251%
JMicron 512GB
23GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 37 36 35 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.1% Poor
Read 54.5
Write 22.5
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 35.3
25% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 2.7
492% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 53D512M64D4RQ-046 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4267 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.4% Below average
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 13.2
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 9
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 188
21% 188 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 10 60 0" 1296 800
Typical G1621-02 Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: GPD G1621-02

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback