Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 237%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 221%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics248% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8509
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 16 '23 at 00:21
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$203
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Memory 91.2
1-Core 144
2-Core 289
96% 175 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 1033
96% 801 Pts
64-Core 1,036
64% 1,036 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$750
Gigabyte(1458 40EC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
248% Outstanding
Lighting 365
Reflection 350
Parallax 370
298% 362 fps
MRender 481
Gravity 300
Splatting 215
258% 332 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 248%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$50
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AAHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 316 325 319 316 306 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 816
Write 394
Mixed 503
SusWrite 314
112% 507 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 92.8
4K Mixed 42.4
143% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 737
DQ Write 540
DQ Mixed 281
307% 519 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 125%
Great: 193%
Corsair MP600 PRO 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: EIFM31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1222 1440 1701 1867 1911 1992 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 964
Write 1,230
Mixed 1,119
SusWrite 1,689
284% 1,251 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 60.6
191% 70.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,673
DQ Write 1,390
DQ Mixed 1,533
1,148% 1,532 MB/s
Poor: 269%
This bench: 269%
Great: 627%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$46
2TB free
Firmware: MX4OAC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 191 192 191 194 193 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 186
Mixed 34
SusWrite 192
106% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.5
142% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 106%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 35.4
MC Mixed 27.8
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 36.7
SC Mixed 25.3
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 120 23.5" 1280 720 ACR06A7 KG241Q P
Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx Builds (Compare 1,682 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $836
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback