Today's hottest deals

Asus Z97-PRO (Wi-Fi ac)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z97-PRO (Wi-Fi ac)  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '17 at 22:11
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Memory 94.7
1-Core 139
2-Core 276
94% 170 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 725
74% 601 Pts
64-Core 726
45% 726 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Asus(1043 84B5) 1GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 16
Parallax 17
16% 17.6 fps
MRender 23.5
Gravity 19.2
Splatting 16.6
16% 19.8 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160
434GB free
Firmware: M0CR011 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 482
Write 195
Mixed 283
70% 320 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 15.3
108% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 15.2
70% 159 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 104%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
246GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WDC WD2002FAEX-007BA0 (TurboPC EX) 512GB
60GB free
Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
105% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 484
Mixed 461
108% 482 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 35.8
158% 63.2 MB/s
DQ Read 83.9
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 21.5
62% 126 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$97
1TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 142
Write 133
Mixed 129
101% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.18
4K Write 2.37
4K Mixed 0.52
151% 1.36 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 85%
Samsung SSD 840 EVO 250GB
232GB free, PID 0700
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.7% Excellent
Read 43.1
Write 43.1
Mixed 43.1
56% 43.1 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 19.9
4K Mixed 11.3
1,122% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 16.2
DQ Write 20.1
DQ Mixed 11.5
1,133% 15.9 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 147%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
60.4% Good
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 18.3
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 21.3
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 58
69% 58 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-PRO(Wi-Fi ac) Builds (Compare 1,016 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-PRO (Wi-Fi ac)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $688
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $217Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback