Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics99.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140613
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 03 '23 at 14:22
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 111
2-Core 207
80% 137 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 491
51% 408 Pts
64-Core 474
29% 474 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.4% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 108
Parallax 124
98% 118 fps
MRender 172
Gravity 117
Splatting 99
102% 129 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 505ABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 67
Write 50.7
Mixed 84.5
15% 67.4 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 12.5
60% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 73.2
DQ Write 60.1
DQ Mixed 46.4
40% 59.9 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 69%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 356GB
34GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 32 36 34 34 33 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.6% Very poor
Read 21.7
Write 36.5
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 32.7
23% 30.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.3
50% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 74%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 644GB
59GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 40 43 41 39 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 135
Write 67.5
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 39.8
56% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
212% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 179%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109
265GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 82 81 81 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 76.2
Write 74.2
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 81.3
51% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
55.4% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 17.8
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 15.6
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 57 37 60 24" 1920 1080 SAM0D92 S24D330
Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,817 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $925
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback