ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 7034BB8

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Lenovo 7034BB8 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110428
Uptime	6 Days
Run Date	Feb 12 '14 at 14:11
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 92.7 2-Core 178 62% 136 Pts	4-Core 330 8-Core 328 44% 329 Pts	64-Core 331 20% 331 Pts
Poor: 47% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$21 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 357GB free Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 188563629 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 268 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 77 60 53587899 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 18878 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 189 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 114 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 59 605552675 (C2) HDA temperature 35 41 77309411363 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 34 21 188563629 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -83279415850069 (F1) Unknown 100 253 229986262 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3180379071	68.5% Good	Read 121 Write 118 Mixed 20.8 63% 86.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.59 4K Mixed 0.62 123% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 70%
Msft Virtual Disk 63GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 21GB free Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	53.9% Above average	Read 122 Write 66.1 Mixed 62 62% 83.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 1.55 4K Mixed 0.35 98% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 54%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 9,902 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	5.44% Terrible	Read 20.5 Write 6.59 Mixed 6.15 11% 11.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.29 4K Write 0.005 4K Mixed 0.02 17% 1.44 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.44% Great: 6%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback