Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 98% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 93% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

7 months ago, 7 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	19.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210427
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 04 '23 at 20:28
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-11600K-$180 43,966 User benchmarks, average bench 99% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	92.5% Outstanding	Memory 94.9 1-Core 158 2-Core 291 100% 181 Pts	4-Core 484 8-Core 854 81% 669 Pts	64-Core 1,175 73% 1,175 Pts
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 92.5% Great: 108%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 85AA) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.13 Performing below potential (51^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	102% Outstanding	Lighting 128 Reflection 140 Parallax 132 104% 133 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 134 Splatting 116 99% 122 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,551 Write 1,891 Mixed 1,524 440% 1,989 MB/s	4K Read 67.5 4K Write 193 4K Mixed 95.1 326% 118 MB/s	DQ Read 1,530 DQ Write 1,368 DQ Mixed 1399 1,063% 1,432 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 8TB 394 User benchmarks, average bench 560% 5TB free Firmware: 1.0.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 384 386 395 393 392 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	45.8% Average	Read 374 Write 323 Mixed 107 SusWrite 388 67% 298 MB/s	4K Read 7.1 4K Write 10.4 4K Mixed 3.4 21% 6.97 MB/s	DQ Read 42.8 DQ Write 12 DQ Mixed 3.4 9% 19.4 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 867%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G Skill Intl F4-3600C16-16GVKC 2x16GB 5,294 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	113% Outstanding	MC Read 41.5 MC Write 41.5 MC Mixed 38.8 116% 40.6 GB/s	SC Read 27.5 SC Write 43.5 SC Mixed 33.8 100% 34.9 GB/s	Latency 57.3 70% 57.3 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 128%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 18: 0P 2R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
18%	15%	40	213	59	144	27"	2048 1152	AOC2710 AG271QG4

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS Builds (Compare 4,014 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 104%

UFO

Desktop 105%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS

CPU
Core i7-11700KIntel $258Bench 101%, 65,651 samples	976x
Core i5-11600KIntel $180Bench 99%, 43,966 samples	718x
Core i9-11900KIntel $265Bench 103%, 44,319 samples	449x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	377x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	343x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	332x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	274x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $102Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	246x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	199x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	111x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GBCorsairBench 90%, 101,975 samples	110x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $68Bench 85%, 86,372 samples	104x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 106% - Outstanding

Total price: $648

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16