Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16R5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive71.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star GF63 Thin 10SC
MotherboardMSI MS-16R5  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210830
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateSep 09 '23 at 01:29
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 125
2-Core 240
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 695
69% 561 Pts
64-Core 787
49% 787 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 12F4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 6
Reflection 50.7
Parallax 7
5% 21.2 fps
Gravity 8.4
Splatting 0.1
3% 4.25 fps
Poor: 4% Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3256B-AI1 256GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 68 44 96 64 48 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
71.3% Very good
Read 238
Write 193
Mixed 16.9
SusWrite 71.8
29% 130 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 87.1
4K Mixed 38.5
116% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 586
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 388
308% 437 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 211%
Lexar SL600 1TB
213GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 360 367 361 402 400 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.5% Good
Read 392
Write 393
Mixed 362
SusWrite 381
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 18.7
79% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 57.2
70% 120 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C20S4/8G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.1% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 15.8
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 17
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 15.5" 1536 864 CMN15E7
Typical MS-16R5 Builds (Compare 5,041 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $273WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback