Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82QF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82QF  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '23 at 08:25
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 6600U Graphics
FP7, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Memory 37.1
1-Core 117
2-Core 210
63% 121 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 648
60% 503 Pts
64-Core 880
54% 880 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3801) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.40.64.25
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
12.4% Very poor
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 26.5
Parallax 35.5
10% 24.5 fps
MRender 19.3
Gravity 19.2
Splatting 26.5
18% 21.7 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZAL4512HBLU-00BL2 512GB
440GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7L1QHXC7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,895
Write 1560
Mixed 1,494
367% 1,649 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 55.4
172% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 496
DQ Write 407
DQ Mixed 436
331% 446 MB/s
Poor: 104% Great: 320%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1G32D4DR-031 WT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
MC Read 33.4
MC Write 35
MC Mixed 32.6
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 34.4
SC Mixed 26
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 216
18% 216 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 30 60 14" 1280 720 LEN8A98
Typical 82QF Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Lenovo 82QF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback