Digibras CL341

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDigibras CL341  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel Emerald Lake 2
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130407
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 26 '23 at 11:10
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3217U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
21.9% Poor
Memory 32.1
1-Core 33
2-Core 56.7
25% 40.6 Pts
4-Core 68.9
8-Core 69.1
9% 69 Pts
64-Core 67.7
4% 67.7 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Intel(8086 2211) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.69% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 2.5
3% 2.93 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4
2% 2.97 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.69%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST320LM001 HN-M320MBB 320GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 42 43 34 55 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Read 33.9
Write 34.5
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 42
26% 35.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
63% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HB3SU004GFM8MMB33 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 4.1
11% 3.77 GB/s
SC Read 1
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 1.6
5% 1.87 GB/s
Latency 250
16% 250 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 37 60 14" 1280 720 LGD03B3
Typical CL341 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Digibras CL341

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $336
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback