Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 156%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 221%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics231% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive288% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory512GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 512GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus WS-C621E-SAGE Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK WS-C621E-SAGE Series
Memory501.5 GB free of 512 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '23 at 13:52
Run Duration365 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4214R
CPU1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 67.6
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 194
67% 120 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 723
65% 547 Pts
64-Core 2874
178% 2874 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$634
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
231% Outstanding
Lighting 327
Reflection 329
Parallax 386
267% 348 fps
MRender 476
Gravity 301
Splatting 215
257% 331 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 231%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$110
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1728 1717 1734 1707 1708 1686 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
288% Outstanding
Read 1,906
Write 1,770
Mixed 1,734
SusWrite 1,713
401% 1,781 MB/s
4K Read 51.6
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 65.6
226% 79.3 MB/s
DQ Read 905
DQ Write 770
DQ Mixed 833
625% 836 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 288%
Great: 477%
Areca ARC-1886-VOL#000 12TB
11TB free
Firmware: R001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1447 162 792 1207 378 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Areca ARC-1886-VOL#001 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: R001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2563 2019 2020 2020 2020 2020 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Areca ARC-1886-VOL#002 2TB
929GB free
Firmware: R001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1557 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A8K40B22-CWD 8x31.9GB
8 of 12 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
81.8% Excellent
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 40.6
MC Mixed 27
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 97.2
41% 97.2 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 221%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 23.5" 1920 1017 SAM0D2C C24F390
Typical WS-C621E-SAGE Series Builds (Compare 152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 157%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 213%
UFO

System: Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $1,214
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback