Gigabyte Z790 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 131%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics72.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte Z790 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory121 GB free of 128 GB
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 05 '23 at 00:19
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900K-$460
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Memory 89.8
1-Core 233
2-Core 462
135% 262 Pts
4-Core 919
8-Core 1,766
159% 1,342 Pts
64-Core 4,323
268% 4,323 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 131%
Great: 135%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.6% Very good
Lighting 90.6
Reflection 90
Parallax 84.1
74% 88.2 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 78.7
Splatting 72.3
70% 88.3 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MSI M570 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EQFM22.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,679
Write 4,750
Mixed 2,718
900% 4,049 MB/s
4K Read 83.8
4K Write 292
4K Mixed 130
449% 169 MB/s
DQ Read 2,244
DQ Write 1,325
DQ Mixed 1,695
1,286% 1,755 MB/s
Poor: 387% Great: 843%
WD My Passport 0827 2TB
561GB free, PID 0827
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 76.6
Write 78.2
Mixed 47
84% 67.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-5600J2834F324x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
183% Outstanding
MC Read 72.2
MC Write 71.1
MC Mixed 68.9
202% 70.7 GB/s
SC Read 25.5
SC Write 53.8
SC Mixed 38.9
113% 39.4 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 124%
This bench: 183%
Great: 183%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 75 34.1" 1280 720 GSM76E4 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical GA-Z790 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 9,535 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 291%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 346%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z790 AORUS ELITE AX - $205

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $1,568
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback