Gigabyte Z370P D3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z370P D3
MotherboardGigabyte Z370P D3  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 07 '23 at 11:16
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 50%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$259
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
99% Outstanding
Memory 94.6
1-Core 140
2-Core 284
95% 173 Pts
4-Core 555
8-Core 892
89% 723 Pts
64-Core 890
55% 890 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 99%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 154
Reflection 152
Parallax 157
126% 155 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 133
Splatting 119
117% 147 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 118%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso SSD 128GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1228BS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 49 49 50 37 51 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 91%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
509GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 399 398 408 419 414 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 393
Write 87.4
Mixed 284
SusWrite 407
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 42.6
135% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 354
267% 356 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 121%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
130GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 288 288 287 287 287 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 422
Write 423
Mixed 378
SusWrite 300
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 90.3
4K Mixed 53.3
176% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 325
252% 344 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 106%
Great: 124%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$100
587GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 399 398 407 418 414 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 435
Mixed 409
SusWrite 404
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 88.9
4K Mixed 47.6
153% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 345
261% 351 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 107%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AR32C16S8K2SU416R 89F2 AR36C18S8K2HU416R 89F2 AR32C16S8K2SU416R 89F2 AR36C18S8K2HU416R 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.6% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 11.3
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 11.2
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 58.7
68% 58.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 42: 0P 3R 6G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
42% 20% 89 66 49 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0F9D C27R50x
Typical GA-Z370P D3-CF Builds (Compare 7,388 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370P D3 - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $549
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback