Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M3504YA_M3504YA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M3504YA_M3504YA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M3504YA
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230206
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateOct 10 '23 at 19:17
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
47.7% Average
Memory 54.9
1-Core 58.9
2-Core 117
45% 77 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 416
38% 317 Pts
64-Core 592
37% 592 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 1883) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.44
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
8.1% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 9.4
Parallax 22.9
7% 13.5 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 18.8
Splatting 11.8
11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.1%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA1T0QFM 1TB
901GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA003
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 654
Write 624
Mixed 584
138% 621 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 18.7
4K Mixed 12.2
56% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 330
209% 241 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 367%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 Hynix HMAG68EXNSA051N 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
51% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 18.9
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 170 53 60 15.5" 1280 720 SDC4161
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M3504YA_M3504YA Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M3504YA_M3504YA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback